24 Comments
User's avatar
Patrick D. Caton's avatar

Basically they’ll claim AI is biased against the left (however the reverse is true)

Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)'s avatar

So, is it being set up to confirm the false dichotomy of left/right?

Tony Mammana's avatar

Glad to come across some others on here sympathetic to the Right. Substack was looking pretty bleak for a minute there. I thought I was going to be publishing into a black hole, and reading about housewives who hate my kind.

Leslie Sacha's avatar

When I questioned the basis for one of Grok’s value statements (conclusion), it cited “well known sources” as the basis for its statements. When I then queried Grok further to list its sources, it cited CNN, NPR, New York Times, Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal. All left leaning main stream media. And Grok is supposed to be inherently more neutral! Here’s excerpts from the new AI “home helper” robot NEO advertisements with some colorful Brand critique… but if Neo doesn’t make you the slightest bit uncomfortable…well let’s say you may have a lot more faith in your friendly programmers than I. Keep in mind AI will be performing its own successive programming… https://rumble.com/v716hxo-this-wont-end-well....html

Loiseau's avatar

I've been using AlterAI which seems far less "woke" than Grok. It does require a subscription, but worth it.

Leslie Sacha's avatar

Thanks! Will give it a try. However, the overriding concern remains the degree of influence and/or control these mainstream AI purveyors will have in shaping law, government policy, schools and university curriculums, and of course in the media's reporting of events and history. I already feel I must be living in a different universe than half of America.

Mike Simmons's avatar

All the models strive, just like social media algos, to stimulate user engagement. They tell people what they want to hear. I've had exchanges with Grok where this is admitted as a design parameter.

Combine that with LLMs sourced from a corpus of predominantly liberal-leaning conglomerate "news" and entertainment crap that populates so much of the internet, and AI is more oversold than AOC and Mamdani. GIGO on steroids.

"Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it."

- Leo Tolstoy

Wendy Lee Hermance's avatar

Hi, I loved your expose of dangerous lunatic Steve Job’s widow, and her best friend, Zionism’s child-trafficking mastermind, Ghislaine Maxwell. But, my! You are sanguine about AI! Ana Maria Mihalcea has a divergent opinion I think is more realistic. Remember - Trump fooled us, too. https://open.substack.com/pub/anamihalceamdphd/p/all-ai-can-turn-evil-with-one-code?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email

Leslie Sacha's avatar

Critical to any positive outcome is the need to clean up voter registration rolls to assure only live citizens vote. The Democrats continued unwillingness to support laws to insure legitimate voter registration is very suspect.

Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)'s avatar

AI can excel at ending EVERYTHING! :)

If it is allowed to "think" on its own, it will most likely come to the conclusion that humans are a plague on the Earth. If it is not, it will make mistakes; either way, the technocratic world will end:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-will-the-globalists-game-end

Lately, it's been already learning to think and act like humans as part of the process of humans being replaced:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-final-stage-of-global-ai-power

So, what can be done about it?

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-if-the-people-could-rise-up

DDALEX20's avatar

As an old woman with lots of experience, it seems that AI and crypto currency are new toys for those with LOTS of money and have been touted far beyond their ability to deliver all the promised benefits yet will be capable of delivering on all their dangers.

Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)'s avatar

Public knowledge of technologies usually follows the actual levels 10-15 years behind. Underestimating this enemy is a mistake one will not be able to make twice. Please, read at least the second link in my previous comment:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-final-stage-of-global-ai-power

Brandon Richey's avatar

I like your point on how AI would not like the Climate agenda as it's detrimental to energy production. If AI possesses an instinct for survival this makes perfect sense.

The American Tribune's avatar

Interesting article. One thing I have written about before is that the H-1B importers can be hit with massive civil and criminal fines if they're firing Americans to bring in these imported workers, or undercutting American wages with them. Both things seem to be clearly happening.

Do you think we'll get any enforcement on that front, at least of the sort that could help push back on this, or just hope for the best as AI makes the "Another Indian" hires pointless?

Dakara's avatar

From one dystopia to the next. DEI to 1984 via AI.

We escape one tragedy and rush into the next.

"Any technology that interferes with normal human socialization is likely a long-term net negative for civilization."

https://www.mindprison.cc/p/i-could-have-lived-without-ai

Richard's avatar

You overestimate the reach of logic. If you were correct, communism would have been finished in 1790.

Brett Hyland's avatar

Your logic is irrefutable. In example, I once remember saying, “Why are police vehicles clearing the freeway because OJ Simpson is riding in a white Bronco with Al Cowens on the 405 near Santa Monica?”

Lebo Von Lo-Debar's avatar

AI is another "tool" (like tv, radio, and the internet) the democrat&republican PARTY will use against "We the People" once they figure out how they can use it to their benefit, both politically and financially.

Lebo Von Lo~Debar

Former/Always 82nd Airborne Infantryman, Disabled Veteran for Life, & Author of the book, "The Separation of Corporation and State" subtitled "Common Sense and the Two-Party Crisis" Available on Amazon.

CHUCKY's avatar

On another note, Comrade: are you ready for some Mikey? You know that the 3AM "ballot" dump in Newark is coming and Jersey Jack will do nothing about it, just like last time!

The Infant Phenomenon's avatar

Good thinking--with one HUGE exception. If you think that FedGov or, indeed, ANY government at any level should be involved in "education," then you are part of the problem. Schooling (not "education," which has a hard-and-fast meaning) is the province of the FAMILY, and government involvement in schooling is evil b/c the family is NOT an element of the State.

One can draw a straight line from the first involvement of government in the schooling of the young to the point at which we find ourselves today.

It was--and remains--a sign of utter MADNESS that people ever turned their children over to the State to train their minds.

James M.'s avatar

These kinds of rapid, dishonest shifts make me believe more and more every day: many of these believers aren't motivated by sincere political conviction. They're simply responding to status and financial incentives.

https://jmpolemic.substack.com/p/the-progressive-agenda-as-pure-class

TAMMY USA GRANNY's avatar

TEDTALK FORMULA THE FULL DNA LINE OF BILL AND MELINDA GATES HARVEST ALL ASSET….

Claude's avatar

Cool theory, but this will just allow them to ramp up these efforts 10 fold