82 Comments
User's avatar
Slamy's avatar

Dude really took “Stalin” as a nickname. Wow. When people tell you who they are, believe them.

Expand full comment
Nathan Woodard's avatar

oh wow…i thought that was satire.

Expand full comment
Kathy Christian's avatar

Stalin choked to death over a period of three days. That's how he died. Just as another factoid, King Ahab and his wife Jezebel died particularly horrible deaths for causing the death of an innocent man. Ahab was eaten alive by worms and Jezebel by dogs, only her head and hands remained. God hates hands that shed innocent blood.

Expand full comment
K Tucker Andersen's avatar

Unfortunately, a totally foreseeable tragedy once Mandela died. The ANC is the legacy of Winnie Mandela, not Nelson. The actions of the Episcopal church expose its capture by the woke radical left. Certainly no element of Christianity in their position. Racial division is apparently their new catechism.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

But I thought the great replacement theory was a conspiracy!...:)

Just wait until whites are the minority in the US.

If the Dems are in power you can bank on building your own gulag.

Expand full comment
Mike Ware's avatar

And they depend on useful idiots, like Tucker.

Expand full comment
Mike Ware's avatar

C’mon, Winnie and Nelson, two sides of the same coin. Both radical Marxists. Murderers and thieves, period.

Expand full comment
K Tucker Andersen's avatar

Have to strongly disagree. Nelson was a man of peace and goodwill who like the majority of individuals had no understanding of economics and the structure of incentives. He was a symbol of reconciliation and forgiveness. Winnie was a hater who wanted violent revenge and had no innate humanity, as her condoning of necklacing clearly indicated. Winnie was evil, Nelson was not. Sorry that you choose to be blind to their nuanced differences.Sounds like you are a person who looks to accentuate and emphasize difference rather attempt to find common ground and see the virtue in others. We can recognize reality without letting it foster hatred and disgust. .

Expand full comment
Mike Ware's avatar

And no, I don’t find common ground with communists. Or demonrats.

Expand full comment
Jamal X's avatar

In South Africa, although white individuals comprise only 7% of the total population, they are disproportionately in control of the majority of the country’s land and wealth. This stark imbalance can be traced back to a tragic history characterized by colonization, during which European powers employed force and violence to seize land from the indigenous African peoples. Motivated by greed and the desire for economic gain, these colonial forces enforced invasive practices that led to the systematic dispossession of land from African communities. As a result, the wealth generated from these lands has historically benefited a small minority while leaving the majority of the population with limited access to resources. This enduring legacy of colonial exploitation continues to shape the socioeconomic landscape of South Africa, perpetuating inequalities that are deeply rooted in the nation’s past. Understanding this context is crucial for addressing the ongoing disparities and working towards a more equitable future for all South Africans.

The devastating impact of colonization on Native American communities is a tragic chapter in history, where entire populations were not only decimated through violence and disease but also faced the systematic erasure of their cultures and identities. Simultaneously, the forced removal of vast amounts of social capital and resources from Africa was executed through the brutal systems of slavery, which purposefully dehumanized millions of individuals for the sole purpose of enriching European nations. This horrific exploitation was underpinned by practices of genocide, slavery, and colonization, all of which significantly contributed to the growth of capitalism in Europe and the Americas.

The repercussions of these actions were not small nor limited: they put capitalism on a trajectory that might be described as "on steroids," fostering an economic system built on the suffering and subjugation of countless individuals and communities. This darker side of economic progress resulted in the senseless deaths of millions of people around the globe. The legacies of these events continue to shape social, economic, and political realities today, as the echoes of systemic inequality and injustice can still be felt in contemporary society. In essence, the advancements in wealth and power for some came at an unimaginable cost to many, revealing a historical narrative steeped in deep-seated violence and moral compromise.

Expand full comment
Mike Ware's avatar

You’re full of shit up to your ducking eyeballs 👀

Expand full comment
Susan Clack's avatar

He got A's at Berserkley, I'll betcha. And is probably his local Politburo's Public Affairs Officer. 🙄 Or his ChatBot got its data loaded at the DNC. 🙄🙄

Expand full comment
Jamal X's avatar

Oh, is that an Ad Hominem I hear? Well, while your momma is enjoying a little backyard party on my property with some South African Boerbels, your daddy seems to be quite busy on the other side of the fence pleasuring himself. Must be a thrilling afternoon for everyone involved! Lol!

Expand full comment
Ray Bob's avatar

Looks like somebody used AI to write an absolute b******* screed, the evil white people you're talking about ,that stole all the land and made all the money from it, they built cities, infrastructure, Farms made life better, brought these people who to this day still live in mud huts into the modern world. look up Rwanda when the Europeans were in control it was a thriving community once the blacks and the Communists took over it went to s*** it's pretty much all you need to know.

Expand full comment
Mike Ware's avatar

Hey dipshit, the Dutch bought the land from black tribesmen because they didn’t want it! Your AI nonsense is tiresome. It’s BS and we’re onto it. You’ll convince no one with your ridiculous revisionist history. Blacks can’t run an ice cream stand, much less a country.

Expand full comment
Jamal X's avatar

The contemporary political landscape in the United States has been significantly influenced by a number of movements and ideologies, one of which is Project 2025—a controversial initiative that appears to advocate for white supremacy and a fascist agenda rooted in the concept of white male hegemony. This initiative is predicated on the somewhat insidious idea that white males, in particular, are somehow victimized in a society that they historically dominate and control. This notion is built upon a myth of white male victimhood, which seeks to portray white men as the oppressed group in a country where they disproportionately hold and manage a staggering 85% of the nation’s wealth.

This disparity raises important questions about structural racism and economic inequality. Structural racism is not merely about individual acts of prejudice; rather, it is more accurately understood as a complex system of policies, institutional practices, and cultural norms that create and perpetuate inequality between racial groups. In this context, the relationship between various social groups becomes critical for understanding the dynamics of privilege and oppression. It becomes evident that the claim of victimhood espoused by proponents of white supremacy oversimplifies a far more nuanced reality.

The assertion that white men are the victims in today's society ignores the historical and ongoing systemic advantages they enjoy—advantages that have been built over centuries through various forms of institutional and societal support. This narrative not only fails to recognize the challenges faced by marginalized groups, particularly people of color, but it also serves to reinforce existing hierarchies and inequalities that benefit a specific demographic while marginalizing others.

In examining Project 2025 and the broader ideologies it represents, it becomes apparent that these movements often resort to divisive tactics that exploit fears and grievances. These tactics are designed to rally support by positioning white men as the beleaguered heroes fighting against an imagined oppression, thereby redirecting attention away from systemic issues and the conversations needed to address economic and racial inequalities.

The broader implications of such ideologies are troubling. They can foster a culture of exclusion and hostility, making it increasingly difficult to engage in constructive dialogue about race, privilege, and justice. By perpetuating the myth of white male victimhood, these movements not only undermine efforts toward equity and inclusion but also diminish the very real experiences of those who face systemic discrimination and economic hardship based on their race or gender.

Ultimately, confronting and dismantling these narratives is crucial for fostering a more equitable and just society. Only through an honest assessment of our shared history and an understanding of the complex interplay of race, wealth, and power can we begin to address the systemic inequities that persist in our society.

Expand full comment
Mike Ware's avatar

PROJECT 2025? You gotta be kidding me. Keep pushing your phony fake BS propaganda! You’re trying to start a race war. FAFO about that.

Expand full comment
Jamal X's avatar

I used to rescue clueless wannabe Proud Boys like you from Aryan Brotherhood prison gang rapes at the beginning of my 34-year career in the prison industrial complex. Crips and Bloods usually got the leftovers, with new punks serving the tiers.

Expand full comment
Jamal X's avatar

The race war has already started, white supremacist! You are acting like a retard sucking your uncle's dick.

Expand full comment
Mike Ware's avatar

🤣 remind me why Nelson was in prison. He was a murderous scumbag and a godless communist. Never did stop his wife from killing. Don’t be a chump falling for his garbage lies.

Expand full comment
Jamal X's avatar

It seems that you might have concerns about how issues related to the rights of Black individuals regarding self-protection and overall freedom are perceived or discussed. This is a complex topic that touches on historical injustices, systemic inequalities, and ongoing struggles for civil rights. Many people advocate for the rights of all individuals, including Black individuals, to have the freedom to protect themselves and assert their rights without facing discrimination or violence. It’s important to have open and constructive conversations about these issues, recognizing the diverse perspectives and experiences that shape the discourse around race, rights, and justice in society. How do you see these dynamics influencing conversations about equality and protection in our communities?

South African apartheid was a system of institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination that was strikingly brutal, drawing some parallels to the Jim Crow laws in America. Both systems were designed to maintain the dominance of a particular racial group while oppressing and disenfranchising others. In South Africa, apartheid was characterized by a range of oppressive measures that dictated where individuals could live, work, and associate based on their race, leading to widespread human rights violations. This institutional framework was enforced through violent means, including police brutality and state-sanctioned violence against those who resisted or opposed the regime.

Similarly, the Jim Crow laws in the United States enforced racial segregation in the South following the Reconstruction era, resulting in profound social and economic disparities. African Americans faced systemic oppression, which included voter suppression, public lynchings, and discrimination in education and employment. Both apartheid and Jim Crow reflected deeply ingrained racist ideologies that sought to perpetuate white supremacy and marginalize non-white populations.

In addition to the legal framework that institutionalized these injustices, the lived experiences of individuals under both systems were marked by fear, violence, and dehumanization. Activists in both countries faced harsh repression; in South Africa, the anti-apartheid movement encountered violent crackdowns, while in the U.S., civil rights activists contended with aggressive resistance and hostility from segregationists. The struggles against these oppressive regimes ultimately reveal the resilience and courage of those who fought for justice and equality, showcasing a profound and shared commitment to human rights that transcends national borders.

Expand full comment
Mike Ware's avatar

Nothing complicated about it. Boers built South Africa, period. Blacks have pissed it away and can’t even keep the lights on. They can’t even run a freaking railroad station much less a country.

Expand full comment
Brett's avatar

You have not one single iota of comprehension of what apartheid was or its meaning .. the reason being, you are not from Africa.

Simplistically - there are 11 different major tribes within South Africa excluding the Afrikaners and English speaking South Africans, Indians and Coloureds.

Apartheid was a system that recognized al the African tribes and attempted to create separate state entities for each tribe, with land that they had not historically occupied being designated to the remaining "tribes".

Apartheid means 'separate development' for each tribe with financial and development aid from the central govt of South Africa.

Research the structure the independent states of Transkei, Venda, Bophuthatswana

"AI Overview

Learn more

Bophuthatswana was a "homeland" created by the apartheid government of South Africa for the Tswana people. It was declared independent in 1977 but was never internationally recognized. Bophuthatswana was known as a Bantustan, which was a term used for areas set aside for specific ethnic groups during apartheid.

Here's a more detailed look at Bophuthatswana:

Creation and Purpose:

Bophuthatswana was created as a "homeland" for the Tswana-speaking people under the apartheid regime. The apartheid government aimed to segregate South African society by creating separate territories for different ethnic groups.

Nominal Independence:

Bophuthatswana was declared independent on December 6, 1977. However, it was not recognized by any other country.

Government:

Bophuthatswana was governed by a National Assembly and an executive council. Lucas Mangope was the leader of the homeland for many years.

Capital:

The capital city of Bophuthatswana was Mmabatho.

Reintegration:

Bophuthatswana was re-integrated into South Africa in 1994, after the end of apartheid.

Expand full comment
Jamal X's avatar

Your white supremacist narrative is very condescending and arrogant. You dont know your ass from your from your mouth. During the earlier part of my 36-year career in the prison industrial complex, I rescued clueless wannabe Proud Boys like you from Aryan Brotherhood prison gang butt fuck. Other super predators had the leftovers.

I'm a world traveler, having traveled to all continents. I have traveled to various western African countries. I traveled to South Africa four times on extended stays and have witnessed the remnants of apartheid. Apartheid was whites oppressing Blacks to maldistribute massive generational wealth to whites.

It's about time that African leaders seriously repair the damage done by white supremacist Afrikaner aggressors. The land needs to be redistributed to its indigenous people by any means necessary.

Expand full comment
Zeeb33's avatar

Nelson was literally a terrorist. He was one of the founders of Umkhonto weSizwe, translated as “the tip of the spear”, which was the paramilitary wing of the ANC. The reason he went to jail was he got caught driving a car with a trunkfull of explosives.

Much like MLK, his reputation and narrative were carefully constructed out of dust. When you actually research the person in detail, from primary sources, you get a radically (no pun intended) different picture.

Expand full comment
Jamal X's avatar

Savage European invaders committed immense and horrific acts of genocide against indigenous populations across the globe, deliberately orchestrating a maldistribution of massive generational wealth for themselves. In the periods prior to the onset of the transatlantic slave trade and the colonization efforts that followed, Europe found itself in dire straits. The continent was grappling with a plethora of challenges, including devastating infectious diseases that decimated approximately half of its population. Coupled with these health crises were widespread poverty and rampant crime, leaving communities in shambles. The social fabric was further frayed by the rampant immorality evident in various institutions, including the Catholic Church, where numerous reports of priests committing heinous acts and abusing children surfaced, adding to the moral decay of the society.

Interestingly, the cultural elements that characterized the antebellum Southern "cracker culture" can be traced back to a historical lineage originating from the old cracker cultures of England, Wales, Ireland, and Scotland. This culture, steeped in its own peculiarities, revolved around the pursuit of pleasure for its own sake, the lifestyle of herdsmen, an affinity for violence, and alarming levels of illiteracy. The legacy of physical combat among Celtic men was notorious, with brutal altercations sometimes culminating in acts as extreme as castration. This violent heritage would manifest in various ways throughout history, particularly evident during the Jim Crow era in the Southern United States.

During this tumultuous period, a disturbing trend emerged, reflecting the deeply ingrained insecurities and perversions of some white men who felt threatened by Black masculinity. In their vile acts of aggression, they would sever the genitals of innocent Black men, transforming them into grotesque trophies to display in their homes as symbols of dominance and power. This abhorrent practice and the underlying mentality were indicative of a society steeped in brutality and dehumanization, where the humanity of others was routinely stripped away in an attempt to assert control and superiority.

The grotesque nature of these acts was further immortalized in the creation of postcards that depicted the carnage and violence inflicted upon marginalized communities. These representations served not only as a chilling reminder of the past but also as an unsettling commentary on the brutal lengths to which those in power would go to perpetuate narratives of supremacy and control. The entire historical narrative, intertwined with atrocities, revolved around exploitation, oppression, and a curious fascination with violence that permeated both social structures and personal interactions, leaving an indelible mark on history.

Expand full comment
Jim Carmine's avatar

You are way too funny!!! I keep trying to be a middle of the road slightly left leaning caring open minded Democrat who embraces the preferential option for the poor and drinks Chardonnay with my friends whose book shelves have the complete works of Hillary Clinton and Howard Zinn, but you are corrupting my morals!!!! You are a gateway drug; I need more!!!

Expand full comment
Yuri Bezmenov's avatar

Yuri pills are fun morale boosters. The left is the immoral side - once you see it, you can't unsee it. There are 400+ more posts, enjoy the guilty pleasure binge ;)

Expand full comment
Jamal X's avatar

Suck a Zulu Warrior's dick!

Expand full comment
Brett's avatar

Shaka had small penis syndrome hence the mass slaughtering of 2m+ other blacks while forging the Zulu Nation .. historical notes prove that to be correct and he not produce an heir.

Expand full comment
Jamal X's avatar

Oh, isn’t that just delightful? Your momma is out in my backyard, having the time of her life with my three adorable South African Borbeols. And your daddy? Well, he’s just over there on the other side of the fence, probably enjoying some quality 'me time.' How charming! I have pictures of your momma's first litter of freaks, including you.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

We all know the problem... THEY ARE WHITE, FAMILY ORIENTED, AND SKILLED FOOD GROWERS... all three things the Communist One World Order is against!

These f'n people are beyond belief. Let millions of uninvited, not vetted, illegals in by the droves, no papers, no idea where they are from and take their word for it that they are fleeing oppression and genocide...but apparently white people that are actually experiencing oppression can not be subjected to genocide...well...because they're white.

If you have doubts watch this:

https://x.com/Defundmedianow/status/1924273089644232896?s=19

The MSM is soooo ridiculous. One cannot be for refugees and simultaneously against refugees because of their skin color

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

absolutely ! I would help mothers and children from countries at war (but not the young men) and I would help anyone who is under threat of their lives in their own country! But I remember very well, when the war in Syria was going on, how thousands of young men fled - very little women with children. And how the US is overwhelmed with young South-American men. there is something fishy about that !

Expand full comment
Dave Slough's avatar

For lefty it’s all bout that skin color

Like the KKK coming full circle

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

I did not think it was possible for me to have any more contempt for the Episcopal Church than I already did. I was wrong.

Expand full comment
curt s sanders's avatar

Thank you, Yuri for exposing in detail the Marxist take over of South Africa... Like you said just spewing propaganda double talk BS.. while the genocide of white South Africans goes unbated... Trump needs to use his bully pulpit to rock this Commie clown and shine a spotlight on these murderous thugs...

Expand full comment
Robert C Culwell's avatar

Tragic, but predictable turn towards violence, by the progressive collectivist left. On the Road to Serfdom (Hayek 🇦🇹) violence gets it done, and therefore, rises up thru the ranks 💣 🔪💀 to positions of power. No thing knew under the sun comrade. 🇿🇦 🌐 ⛓️ Socialism is consistent ✔️ ⚰️

Expand full comment
The Candid Clodhopper's avatar

I've got an idea I think the ANC will like:

You know all those "trading places" shows we've got in the US? We've also got some distant relatives of theirs that we can send over. We'll even send 5 for every 3 Afrikaners.

Expand full comment
Mitch's avatar

thousand to one works too

Expand full comment
The Candid Clodhopper's avatar

Remember Soul Plane? Make a plane like that and call it the Liberia Express. We’ll have no shortage of volunteers for the exchange program.

I don’t think basic math is among the ANC’s strengths.

Expand full comment
Mitch's avatar

no takebacks

Expand full comment
jabster's avatar

Why do the elite keep giving commies a pass?

I've said that communism is not for the proles...it's a plaything for the rich.

Communism...the ideology that keeps on killing.

If I had had a bunch of very disposable income after the end of the Cold War, I would have bought up every statue of Marx and Lenin and Stalin and the rest I could have gotten my hands on and rearranged them in various sexual positions and changed the inscriptions to something more fitting, and put them in a museum. These historical figures should be vilified as the worst.

Jello Biafra was right in "Holiday In Cambodia".

Expand full comment
Jim Smith's avatar

In the era of the Vietnamese "boat people" fleeing communism, there were multiple organizations in the U.S. helping them and many Americans offered "sponsorships." Since Amnesty Int'l and the Episcopal church have signaled their disdain, if not hatred, of white South African refugees, refusing to help them, I'm wondering if there are any other organizations in the U.S. that are stepping up to help these new refugees in the same way that the Vietnamese refugees were assisted. Anyone know anything?

Expand full comment
Jason Brain's avatar

Khonza has a LumpedIn profile?! HAHA! "You are a bad person for noticing." Great post YB!

Expand full comment
Donnie Proles's avatar

It’s not happening.

It’s a harmful right-wing conspiracy.

It’s happening and that’s a good thing.

You are a bad person for noticing.

Dude...exactly this. This is the entire strategy. I might add line 5 which is "Ok, we realize this is a problem but fixing it is unconstitutional, racist and a threat to our democracy."

Expand full comment
Luke's avatar

South Africa is a super duper violent society. It's extreme and dangerous depending on where you are in the country. Not just for whites but also for blacks. I think it's a top 5 country by the number of homicides worldwide. They register no less than 20K deaths annually, probably higher if you factor in unreported cases. This won't change anytime soon

Expand full comment
Les Vitailles's avatar

No question South Africa has gone downhill since the days when Winnie Mandela's "Mandela United Football Club" terrorized Soweto with kidnappings, tortures and killings.

https://www.standard.co.uk/hp/front/how-nelson-mandela-betrayed-us-says-exwife-winnie-6734116.html

Expand full comment
John Henry Holliday, DDS's avatar

Chicago, with racists Lightfoot and now Johnson at the helm, aspires to be the polis version of South Africa. Always corrupt, but nonetheless functional ("The city that works."), the Windy City is apparently dead-set on adding incompetence to the mix. The new Detroit.

Expand full comment
Brandy's avatar

So, they want them to stay, have their homes taken, be raped and bullied because they are required to somehow be present and happy to pay for sins they did not commit? I their own words, they are saying they have to stay so that their grievances can be addressed. I guess if they all leave, there will be nothing left to take or hope for in the future.

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

You can't look forward to raping, torturing, or murdering, if they've left. Don't you know that takes all the fun out of life? 🙄😳🤪

Expand full comment