How To Do No Harm (Part 2)

The most dangerous doctors in America, questions to ask your doctor, and a campaign against Plume Health

Comrades: Teachers and doctors were once known as the noble professions, but the past few years have destroyed whatever faith the public once had in them.

In Part 1 of How To Do No Harm, I shared my professional experiences with the healthcare system and personal experiences with doctors I know. How To Spot a Sociopath Part 2 covered the infamous public health “doctors” we all loathe, who have caused immense damage at a population level. How To Fire a Commissar featured a DIE administrator who is draining the scarce resources of a hospital that serves the vulnerable.

Today’s post will focus on the most dangerous doctors who actively practice on patients and prescribe drugs. I would be remiss without recognizing the many righteous doctors out there: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Martin Kuldroff, Dr. Vinay Prasad, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, etc.

Please consider a paid subscription to help me campaign against these healthcare institutions.

---

This is the Twitter cover photo of Plume Health, a trans telehealth company that mails hormones and surgery support letters after a virtual consultation. The LinkedIn and physiognomy of Founder Dr. Jerrica Kirkley is what you’d expect. We must shut down this evil company that is likely violating many laws.

****

Please amplify this tweet to call in the cavalry.

****

---

Almost every major health system in Karenland FUPAZ has a child castration clinic. As Matt Walsh exposed, it’s a profitable business that generates permanent subscription revenue for Big Pharma. The billionaire Pritzker family is profiting from trans the same way the Sackler family profited from opioids.

---

Child castrators all have the Karen and soy bugman physiognomy:

Dr. Christy Olezeki of Yale Medical School proudly advocates for children as young as 3 to begin a “gender journey” with her help. Physiognomy check - demonic sanpaku eyes Karen:

Dr. Michelle Forcier of Brown Medical School compared injecting hormones to turning music on and off:

Dr. Niamh Gallagher proudly posts her handiwork on Instagram:

Few doctors look like the ones featured on in-flight magazines:

Trans Healthcare has a full directory of criminals who enjoy the full protection of our groomer justice system:

The smarter ones have scrubbed their online profiles to hide. I hope they are sued into bankruptcy and imprisoned for their crimes against humanity and destroying the lives of thousands of children: Dr. Megan Ranney, Dr. Kellyn Lakhardt, Dr. Winston Wong, Dr. Frances Grimstad, Dr. Naida Dowshen, etc.

Other doctors do harm beyond child castration. Dr. David Mou is CEO of Cerebral, a company under investigation for oversubscribing Adderall via telehealth and killing several children. A man of such low ethics unsurprisingly has 3 Harvard degrees (undergrad, medical, business trifecta) and is both a Soros Fellow and a member of World Economic Forum Global Shapers.

---

Instead of asking your doctors about drugs advertised in commercials, ask them:

• Why have only 2% of children under 5 gotten the COVID jab?

• Why have only 2% of eligible Americans gotten the bivalent booster? Do you plan to get a booster every 2 months, as recommended by the CDC?

• Why is Denmark now recommending against COVID jabs for healthy people under 50 and other European countries doing the same?

• Why did any schools remain closed and masked after Fall 2020, when Sweden and Florida proved that kids going to school without masks was fine?

• The CDC claimed that the COVID jabs prevent transmission and infection, but don’t affect menstrual cycles and breast milk. Since real world data proves all of those claims false, was the CDC spreading lies and misinformation?

• Why did Dr. Aseem Malhotra change his mind about the COVID jabs?

• Why did Dr. Leana Wen change her mind about masking children?

• Why is NYC still banning 400,000 kids from extracurriculars for not getting the COVID jab?

• What is your stance on California’s new bill AB2098? What is the point of being a doctor and patient-doctor confidentiality if you have to follow everything that government and their big pharma lobbyists say?

• Are you capable of changing your mind when presented with new information?

• What is a woman?

• Can men get pregnant?

• If I change my pronouns to she/her, can I go to women’s locker rooms and expose my genitals?

• Is it fair for biological men to compete against women in sports?

• Can minors under 18 consent to permanent physiological alterations like puberty blockers and masectomies?

• Why is the billionaire Pritzker family funding trans healthcare initiatives? How much money is made from each trans patient for surgeries and drugs?

• Why did we spend several decades and billions of dollars on Alzheimer’s and depression treatments that did not work?

• Are you familiar with the Great Barrington Declaration, Nuremberg code, and the Asch conformity experiment?

• Is it ethical to prioritize life saving treatments based on race or other immutable characteristics?

• Is it fair for diversity administrators who don’t treat patients earning $350,000/year?

• Is looking for someone who you knew died months ago a sign of dementia?

• Does the chart below strike you as unfair or racist?

On a personal note, I once thought I wanted to become a doctor. Taking organic chemistry freshman year quickly disabused me of that notion, as I could barely stay awake or pass an exam. Weed out classes like orgo exist to forge professionals who have the skill and determination to withstand high stress and save your life. Society is better off that I am here sitting in front of my laptop instead of holding a scalpel. Now that we are lowering the bar to the point where struggling SAT optional students can get a top organic chemistry professor fired at NYU, we are all in mortal danger. Stay out of the hospital. If you do have to go see a doctor, seek an older private practice doctor.

---

Once again, we are seeing echoes of history. This Science Direct abstract should be required reading in every medical school. Unfortunately most students are now indoctrinated into DEI.

During the Weimar Republic more than half of all German physicians became early joiners of the Nazi Party, surpassing the party enrollments of all other professions. From early on, the German Medical Society played the most instrumental role in the Nazi medical program, beginning with the marginalization of Jewish physicians, proceeding to coerced “experimentation,” “euthanization,” and sterilization, and culminating in genocide via the medicalization of mass murder of Jews and others caricatured and demonized by Nazi ideology. Given the medical oath to “do no harm,” many postwar ethical analyses have strained to make sense of these seemingly paradoxical atrocities. Why did physicians act in such a manner?

Yet few have tried to explain the self-selected Nazi enrollment of such an overwhelming proportion of the German Medical Society in the first place. This article lends insight into this paradox by exploring some major vulnerabilities, motives, and rationalizations that may have predisposed German physicians to Nazi membership—professional vulnerabilities among physicians in general (valuing conformity and obedience to authority, valuing the prevention of contamination and fighting against mortality, and possessing a basic interest in biomedical knowledge and research), economic factors and motives (related to physician economic insecurity and incentives for economic advancement), and Nazi ideological and historical rationalizations (beliefs about Social Darwinism, eugenics, and the social organism as sacred). Of particular significance for future research and education is the manner in which the persecution of Jewish physician colleagues was rationalized in the name of medical ethics itself.

“The medical crimes of the Third Reich were the result of a dynamic triad involving the state, the medical profession, and an academic enterprise comprising the universities and the research institutes.” (Seidelman, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 2000)

From the AHRP:

The pivotal factor that led German physicians to become murderers was the usurpation of the medical profession’s traditional commitment to healing, and serving the best interest of the individual patient – with preventive medicine which focuses on the application of interventions aimed at preventing and eliminating suspected genetic defects and disease for the presumed “greater good” of society.

Why Physicians are Vulnerable to Becoming Perpetrators:

• Compartmentalization

• Tendencies toward sadism, voyeurism

• Healing through hurting

• Use of science to objectify violence

• Use of metaphors and euphemisms

• Justifying and rationalizing

• Medicalizing Narcissistic grandiocity

Finally, from an excellent long-form essay The City Journal:

The post–George Floyd racial reckoning has hit the field of medicine like an earthquake. Medical education, medical research, and standards of competence have been upended by two related hypotheses: that systemic racism is responsible both for racial disparities in the demographics of the medical profession and for racial disparities in health outcomes. Questioning those hypotheses is professionally suicidal. Vast sums of public and private research funding are being redirected from basic science to political projects aimed at dismantling white supremacy. The result will be declining quality of medical care and a curtailment of scientific progress.